It is not a market that is dominated by just a few companies or firms.
The entire industry system in the United States is based on oligopoly, a system in which a few companies or firms hold a monopoly over a market. This is not a bad thing; oligopoly is just a system that works well in many situations, especially when there is a lack of competition in the market.
By oligopoly, I mean that a few companies dominate markets that were previously dominated by multiple players. In other words, in an industry that is dominated by multiple companies, at least one company has a control over the market that others do not.
In this case, the market is basically the game of monopoly capitalism, where the players (companies) are not competing with each other directly. Instead, they are in competition with each other through third-party agents like the government. This is an example of monopolies that work well as long as there is competition in the market.
The market is effectively a single company: The game is basically a game of chess, where the game rules for the players are dictated by the company that owns the game of monopoly capitalism. The company that rules the market is called the oligopolist. This is a company that has the ability to monopolize that market, by having multiple companies (or more than one company) that all dominate the market. The oligopoly rules the market, or so the company’s PR people say.
The oligopoly is the most exploitative and most powerful form of market abuse. There are a number of examples of this in history: The movie industry is not the most exploitative form of exploitation for many reasons. First, the movie industry is not particularly profitable per se, but it is extremely profitable because of how much of the film industry’s business is being controlled by the studios. The studios are the ones that decide the content, the distribution, and the price.
The movie studios also control the money in most entertainment, including the television networks, the movie theater owners, and the other movie studios, along with the actors, actresses, and other employees of these studios.
The second problem is that the production and release of movies is very expensive. The studios are very concerned that they will not be able to afford to make a movie that they have not already made and that their competitors will make. This is why the studios are also able to control the cost of their movies by dictating the amount of money that they are allowed to spend on production and production costs.
The third problem is that the studios have a monopoly on distributing movie rights. This is because the studios control movie production by determining what films are made and by dictating the studios how much money is allowed to be invested in the process. The studio’s have a lot of power over the movie business, and they are trying to leverage that power by making sure that they have the right to control every step in the production process.
This monopolistic model has been around since the late 1980s, when a movie studio attempted to buy control of the film distribution chain by acquiring the rights to distribute movies. This was a failed experiment called the “VCR.” The result is that you now have very few movie studios left, because the film studios have been allowed to monopolize all the movie distribution.