You can see in the table below that the industry-low industry-average for the benchmark data is $2,300. The industry-high industry-average for the benchmark data is $2,700.
The first thing that you notice in the information in the table is that the industry-low industry-average is around the same amount of money as the industry-high one. It’s also about the same amount of time it takes to work through the benchmark data. The second thing that you notice is that the data’s industry-high values are much higher than the industry-low ones.
The fact of the matter is that the industry-high benchmark is the only one that is a perfect mirror of the industry-low one. It shows the exact same amount of money and work it takes for a worker to earn it, and its also about the same amount of time it takes for a worker to work through it.
The same goes for the industry-low benchmark. It shows the exact same amount of money and work it takes for a worker to earn it. It also shows the exact same amount of time it takes for a worker to work through it.
As an example, if you have a job that pays $50,000 and you work for a company that pays $1 million and you work for a company that pays $1.5 million, you would expect your employer to pay you $50,000 more than $50,000. But if you worked at a company that paid $1.5 million, you would expect your employer to pay you $2 million more than $1.5 million.
If you take all the values in the list and divide them by the ratio of the two companies, your expectation is that the company that paid 1 million would have to work more hours for the same money. In this case, the company that paid 1 million would have to work more hours and pay more money to keep up with their more expensive worker, while the company that paid 1.5 million would have to work more hours and pay less money to keep up with their less expensive worker.
If this chart were true, it would mean that the company that paid 1 million would be the one with a higher average and be the one with a lower benchmark. This is because the company that paid 1 million would have the most expensive worker.
The question is, is this really a good benchmark? If we look at the chart more closely, it actually shows that the company that paid 1 million would be the one with the highest benchmark.
The problem is that the benchmark isn’t a good one to start with. The average is not a good benchmark, in fact, it’s a lousy one too. The benchmark is the one that is most correlated to the employee’s salary. The average is a poor benchmark because it doesn’t indicate how much more time an average employee is expected to put in. The benchmark is a good one, but it’s not a very good one.
The benchmark is a number. It indicates the average amount of time an employee is expected to spend at their job. You can read about the best and worst benchmarks here.
